<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ParagonsParagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paragonsparagon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paragonsparagon.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Dave Eversole</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Eversole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, best of luck in whatever you decide.  It has been great following your blog this past year or so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, best of luck in whatever you decide.  It has been great following your blog this past year or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Glenn Saunders</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, I also think a restoration project could be funded via Kickstarter.  Right now Kickstarter is peaking and people are throwing money hand-over-fist at things.  For instance, a documentary about Susan Oliver, the actress from The Cage, just got funding.  I chipped in $45 and volunteered my animation services of my Orion slavegirl character if the guy wants it.  If niche programming like that is able to get funded, something like your work surely has a shot at it.  It really depends on how passionate you are to revisit the material and really invest a lot of your time and energy in it yet again.

There&#039;s another project out there that intends to do something similar going on right now which is Starship Yorktown, which is salvaging just the live-action material and completely redoing the FX and inserting new footage.  And so it&#039;s a very TOS Remastered sort of thing where it blends the old with the new, and that makes sense because it has established actors like George Takei in it.  It&#039;s a little harder to justify saving old 8 or 16mm footage of unknown amateur actors.  It&#039;s the very crudeness of the production and the anachronistic mutton-chops and poofy hair that kind of become the main appeal, not so much the storytelling.

So you have to ask yourself whether the time-capsule aspect of it, as a historical document, is what matters to you most, or the Trek story you meant to tell is what matters.  If it&#039;s the story, of your unique take on the Trek mythos, then that is really not shackled to old footage that is costly to restore, and you can take it anywhere you want with modern digital cameras, editing, and FX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I also think a restoration project could be funded via Kickstarter.  Right now Kickstarter is peaking and people are throwing money hand-over-fist at things.  For instance, a documentary about Susan Oliver, the actress from The Cage, just got funding.  I chipped in $45 and volunteered my animation services of my Orion slavegirl character if the guy wants it.  If niche programming like that is able to get funded, something like your work surely has a shot at it.  It really depends on how passionate you are to revisit the material and really invest a lot of your time and energy in it yet again.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another project out there that intends to do something similar going on right now which is Starship Yorktown, which is salvaging just the live-action material and completely redoing the FX and inserting new footage.  And so it&#8217;s a very TOS Remastered sort of thing where it blends the old with the new, and that makes sense because it has established actors like George Takei in it.  It&#8217;s a little harder to justify saving old 8 or 16mm footage of unknown amateur actors.  It&#8217;s the very crudeness of the production and the anachronistic mutton-chops and poofy hair that kind of become the main appeal, not so much the storytelling.</p>
<p>So you have to ask yourself whether the time-capsule aspect of it, as a historical document, is what matters to you most, or the Trek story you meant to tell is what matters.  If it&#8217;s the story, of your unique take on the Trek mythos, then that is really not shackled to old footage that is costly to restore, and you can take it anywhere you want with modern digital cameras, editing, and FX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Glenn Saunders</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ajax is still in preproduction, but there have been articles written about it.  The set (I think it&#039;s just the bridge for now) is being built specifically to provide a free resource to any and all fan trek productions.  This is a really sweet deal.

A sequel to Paragons Paragon would of course not be feasible with the same cast, not unless you set it within the TOS movies, and that would not allow you to use the Ajax set, since it&#039;s a TOS set.

I just think, if you feel that you&#039;ve mined whatever nostalgia-value there was to be had by documenting your old work for people on the internet, that the next step is to try something new, since in so many respects it&#039;s easier these days.

The reason I thought a remake might appeal to you is if you feel that you simply can&#039;t present the old work in a way that satisfies your original internal vision, you could get a second crack at it now.  I would think, though, that with the passage of time you do have something else to say that reflects your older, wiser perspective, rather than who you were and what mattered to you in the 1970s.

http://tinyurl.com/cr7pdf4

Technology has not only made FX easier to do, it provides a way to remotely collaborate and gather knowledge that you didn&#039;t have access to back then.  To me, this is the most promising aspect.  I currently have someone who is working on a CG model for my show--for free.  And he lives in Brazil.  This sort of thing was simply impossible before.  Once you begin to really get keyed onto the possibilities, it becomes quite exciting.  It&#039;s not without its challenges, but using the full resources of the internet is the way to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajax is still in preproduction, but there have been articles written about it.  The set (I think it&#8217;s just the bridge for now) is being built specifically to provide a free resource to any and all fan trek productions.  This is a really sweet deal.</p>
<p>A sequel to Paragons Paragon would of course not be feasible with the same cast, not unless you set it within the TOS movies, and that would not allow you to use the Ajax set, since it&#8217;s a TOS set.</p>
<p>I just think, if you feel that you&#8217;ve mined whatever nostalgia-value there was to be had by documenting your old work for people on the internet, that the next step is to try something new, since in so many respects it&#8217;s easier these days.</p>
<p>The reason I thought a remake might appeal to you is if you feel that you simply can&#8217;t present the old work in a way that satisfies your original internal vision, you could get a second crack at it now.  I would think, though, that with the passage of time you do have something else to say that reflects your older, wiser perspective, rather than who you were and what mattered to you in the 1970s.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cr7pdf4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cr7pdf4</a></p>
<p>Technology has not only made FX easier to do, it provides a way to remotely collaborate and gather knowledge that you didn&#8217;t have access to back then.  To me, this is the most promising aspect.  I currently have someone who is working on a CG model for my show&#8211;for free.  And he lives in Brazil.  This sort of thing was simply impossible before.  Once you begin to really get keyed onto the possibilities, it becomes quite exciting.  It&#8217;s not without its challenges, but using the full resources of the internet is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by JC</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn
hanks for the comments.
I would prefer making a sequel instead of a remake.
I can&#039;t find and preview footage for the Star Trek Ajax movie. Any suggestions?
Thanks for the helpful suggestion about sets.
John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn<br />
hanks for the comments.<br />
I would prefer making a sequel instead of a remake.<br />
I can&#8217;t find and preview footage for the Star Trek Ajax movie. Any suggestions?<br />
Thanks for the helpful suggestion about sets.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Glenn Saunders</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing you may consider doing is taking the premise for Paragons Paragon and extending it or remaking it as a modern fan film.  You can use the sets that are being finished for Star Trek Ajax.  Of course, if you&#039;re worried about money just to restore the old footage, you may not be in a position to do anything new.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing you may consider doing is taking the premise for Paragons Paragon and extending it or remaking it as a modern fan film.  You can use the sets that are being finished for Star Trek Ajax.  Of course, if you&#8217;re worried about money just to restore the old footage, you may not be in a position to do anything new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Thomas Berdinski</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Berdinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey John - I hope all is well - You&#039;re still my favorite blog, even while in stationary orbit!  It may be that there are expensive ways to salvage/restore the movie but there may be less expensive ways as well.  I truly believe I can do a lot with your sound for nothing at all - I have a ton of sound equipment and software in my studio.  And if you have or can locate a film projector, we can get it transfered digitally off a movie screen if necessary.  It may not give you the $700 quality, but it may be surprisingly good with the advances in video cameras and especially editing and effects software (and I have some very good software and equipment...)  Alternately, we could try to raise the money via indiegogo or less formally at the conventions I vend at.  Let&#039;s get in touch again soon and talk about it.  I really want the complete movie to find it&#039;s audience because I know they are out there and they are hungry for it, as am I!  Take care!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John &#8211; I hope all is well &#8211; You&#8217;re still my favorite blog, even while in stationary orbit!  It may be that there are expensive ways to salvage/restore the movie but there may be less expensive ways as well.  I truly believe I can do a lot with your sound for nothing at all &#8211; I have a ton of sound equipment and software in my studio.  And if you have or can locate a film projector, we can get it transfered digitally off a movie screen if necessary.  It may not give you the $700 quality, but it may be surprisingly good with the advances in video cameras and especially editing and effects software (and I have some very good software and equipment&#8230;)  Alternately, we could try to raise the money via indiegogo or less formally at the conventions I vend at.  Let&#8217;s get in touch again soon and talk about it.  I really want the complete movie to find it&#8217;s audience because I know they are out there and they are hungry for it, as am I!  Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Blake Powell</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Powell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check in with Thomas Berdinski for a hand - he is quite close to You (Muskeogan) !! I will talk to you soon

Blake]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check in with Thomas Berdinski for a hand &#8211; he is quite close to You (Muskeogan) !! I will talk to you soon</p>
<p>Blake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOLDING PATTERN by Joe from Malvern</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2013/02/05/holding-pattern/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe from Malvern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1216#comment-232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, what are the technical risks with the old film?  I wonder if Curt McAloney at startrekhistory.org could be of assistance.  He&#039;s a Hollywood film restoration pro whose current project is to restore and preserve original Star Treke film clips, singly or as footage.  I email him from time to time.  Let me know if you want me to reach out to him and ask.  Questions are free of charge!
Joe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, what are the technical risks with the old film?  I wonder if Curt McAloney at startrekhistory.org could be of assistance.  He&#8217;s a Hollywood film restoration pro whose current project is to restore and preserve original Star Treke film clips, singly or as footage.  I email him from time to time.  Let me know if you want me to reach out to him and ask.  Questions are free of charge!<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WALLACES &#8220;STOP MOTION MODEL ARMATURE &amp;  MODEL BUILD-UPS&#8221; by JC</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2012/11/19/wallaces-stop-motion-model-armature-model-build-ups/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1170#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks his short films are Great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks his short films are Great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WALLACES &#8220;STOP MOTION MODEL ARMATURE &amp;  MODEL BUILD-UPS&#8221; by Joe from Malvern</title>
		<link>http://paragonsparagon.com/2012/11/19/wallaces-stop-motion-model-armature-model-build-ups/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe from Malvern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paragonsparagon.com/?p=1170#comment-230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow I hope you&#039;re well and with us John.  

Here&#039;s a kid making homemade versions of movie trailers, including the last Star Trek/JJ Abrams trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YeoEIFcSbs&amp;list=UUpVx5z7QBMcURruCBwNaPWg&amp;index=1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I hope you&#8217;re well and with us John.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a kid making homemade versions of movie trailers, including the last Star Trek/JJ Abrams trailer: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YeoEIFcSbs&#038;list=UUpVx5z7QBMcURruCBwNaPWg&#038;index=1" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YeoEIFcSbs&#038;list=UUpVx5z7QBMcURruCBwNaPWg&#038;index=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
